Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon vs Sardines In Spring Water
Overall, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon
Sardines In Spring Water
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon | Sardines In Spring Water |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 94 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | — |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 22.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 45% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 170 kcal).
- Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 35% less fat (5.9 g vs 9.1 g).
- Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon
PINK SALMON. CONTAINS SALMON.
Sardines In Spring Water
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon or Sardines In Spring Water?
Overall, Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.