Wholemeal Pitta vs Soft pitta
Overall, Wholemeal Pitta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wholemeal Pitta | Soft pitta |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 232 kcal | 256 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 10.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wholemeal Pitta has 34% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Wholemeal Pitta has 38% less sugar (2.5 g vs 4 g).
- Wholemeal Pitta has 47% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Wholemeal Pitta has 72% more fiber (7.2 g vs 2 g).
- Wholemeal Pitta has the better Nutri-Score.
- Wholemeal Pitta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Soft pitta lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Wholemeal Pitta
Wholemeal Wheatflour (contains Gluten), Water, Yeast, Vinegar, Salt, Preservative: E282, Wheat Starch (contains Gluten).
Soft pitta
Wheat Flour [with Calcium, Iron, Niacin (B3) and Thiamin (B1)], Water, Wholemeal Wheat Flour, Wheat Gluten, Dextrose, Yeast, Salt, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Sugar, Emulsifiers: E471, E481; Stabiliser: Xanthan Gum; Gelling Agent: E466; Soya Flour, Preservative: Calcium Propionate; Vegetable Oils (Sustainable Palm, Rapeseed), Flour Treatment Agents: Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), E920 (Vegetarian). SUITABLE FOR VEGÁNS AND VEGETARIANS
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wholemeal Pitta or Soft pitta?
Overall, Wholemeal Pitta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wholemeal Pitta has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 256 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wholemeal Pitta has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.