Comparison
Whole Wheat Elbows vs Schiaffoni
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Wheat Elbows | Schiaffoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 43% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 25% less fat (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Whole Wheat Elbows has no saturated fat, while Schiaffoni has 0.4 g.
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 33% less sugar (2 g vs 3 g).
- Schiaffoni has 38% more fiber (8 g vs 5 g).
- Schiaffoni has 46% more protein (13 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Whole Wheat Elbows
WHOLE DURUM _WHEAT_ FLOUR
Schiaffoni
Semola integrale biologica di GRANO duro.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Wheat Elbows or Schiaffoni?
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Whole Wheat Elbows has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Whole Wheat Elbows has less sugar: 2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.