Comparison
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale vs Schiaffoni
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garofalo Mafalda corta integ... | Schiaffoni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schiaffoni has 15% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has 15% more fiber (9.4 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale
semola integrale di grano duro
Schiaffoni
Semola integrale biologica di GRANO duro.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale or Schiaffoni?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schiaffoni has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schiaffoni has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.