Comparison
Schiaffoni vs Ditali rigati
Overall, Schiaffoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Schiaffoni | Ditali rigati |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ditali rigati has 15% less fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Schiaffoni has 25% less sugar (3 g vs 4 g).
- Schiaffoni has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Schiaffoni lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Schiaffoni
Semola integrale biologica di GRANO duro.
Ditali rigati
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Schiaffoni or Ditali rigati?
Overall, Schiaffoni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schiaffoni has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schiaffoni has less sugar: 3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.