Comparison
Whole Wheat Elbows vs Ditali rigati
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Wheat Elbows | Ditali rigati |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 47% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Whole Wheat Elbows has no saturated fat, while Ditali rigati has 0.3 g.
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 50% less sugar (2 g vs 4 g).
- Ditali rigati has 42% more protein (12 g vs 7 g).
- Whole Wheat Elbows has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Whole Wheat Elbows lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Whole Wheat Elbows
WHOLE DURUM _WHEAT_ FLOUR
Ditali rigati
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Wheat Elbows or Ditali rigati?
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Whole Wheat Elbows has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Whole Wheat Elbows has less sugar: 2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.