Comparison
Whole Wheat Elbows vs Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Better choice
Whole Wheat Elbows
Great Value · 16 oz
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale
Garofalo · 500 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Wheat Elbows | Garofalo Mafalda corta integ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 365 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5 g | 9.4 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 12.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 45% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Whole Wheat Elbows has no saturated fat, while Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has 0.5 g.
- Whole Wheat Elbows has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has 47% more fiber (9.4 g vs 5 g).
- Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has 46% more protein (12.9 g vs 7 g).
Ingredients
Whole Wheat Elbows
WHOLE DURUM _WHEAT_ FLOUR
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale
semola integrale di grano duro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Wheat Elbows or Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale?
Overall, Whole Wheat Elbows has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Whole Wheat Elbows has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Whole Wheat Elbows has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.