Comparison
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale vs Ditali rigati
Overall, Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Garofalo Mafalda corta integ... | Ditali rigati |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | — |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has 12% less sugar (3.5 g vs 4 g).
- Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale
semola integrale di grano duro
Ditali rigati
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale or Ditali rigati?
Overall, Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has fewer calories: 365 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garofalo Mafalda corta integrale has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 4 g per 100 g.