Comparison

White Spread with coconut flakes vs Kokosova mast

Overall, White Spread with coconut flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWhite Spread with coconut fl...Kokosova mast
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 581 kcal 900 kcal
Fat 39.2 g 100 g
Saturated fat 13.2 g 91 g
Sugars 51.2 g 0 g
Salt 0.3 g 0 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0 g
Protein 5.4 g 0 g
Additives20
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • White Spread with coconut flakes has 35% fewer calories (581 kcal vs 900 kcal).
  • White Spread with coconut flakes has 61% less fat (39.2 g vs 100 g).
  • White Spread with coconut flakes has 85% less saturated fat (13.2 g vs 91 g).
  • Kokosova mast has no sugar, while White Spread with coconut flakes has 51.2 g.
  • Kokosova mast has no salt, while White Spread with coconut flakes has 0.3 g.
  • White Spread with coconut flakes has 100% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0 g).
  • White Spread with coconut flakes has 100% more protein (5.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Kokosova mast is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only White Spread with coconut flakes lists: Milk.

Ingredients

White Spread with coconut flakes

sugar, rapeseed oil, palm oil, skimmed milk powder, sweet whey powder (milk, 6% shredded coconut, concentrated butter (milk) lactose, emulsifier, lecithin (sunflower), cocoa butter,

Kokosova mast

Kokosova mast

FAQ

Which is healthier: White Spread with coconut flakes or Kokosova mast?

Overall, White Spread with coconut flakes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

White Spread with coconut flakes has fewer calories: 581 kcal versus 900 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kokosova mast has less sugar: 0 g versus 51.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons