Waffle Fries vs Antica Ricetta 1936
Overall, Waffle Fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Waffle Fries | Antica Ricetta 1936 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 484 kcal |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Waffle Fries has 50% fewer calories (242 kcal vs 484 kcal).
- Waffle Fries has 69% less fat (7.5 g vs 24 g).
- Waffle Fries has 56% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 38% more fiber (5.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 50% more protein (7.2 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Waffle Fries
Potatoes (77%), Coating (12%) (Maize Flour, Potato Starch, Rice Flour, Gluten-Free *Oat Flour, Salt, Spices (Chilli Pepper, Cayenne Pepper, Paprika, Cumin Seed, Black Pepper, Turmeric), Garlic Powder, Onion Powder, Yeast Extract, Spice Extract: Paprika, Natural Black Pepper Flavour), Vegetable Oil (Rapeseed, Sunflower).
Antica Ricetta 1936
Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Waffle Fries or Antica Ricetta 1936?
Overall, Waffle Fries has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Waffle Fries has fewer calories: 242 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antica Ricetta 1936 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.