Antica Ricetta 1936 vs Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena
Overall, Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Antica Ricetta 1936
Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Antica Ricetta 1936 | Patatine al sale marino e ac... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 484 kcal | 494 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 5.5 g | — |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 17% less fat (24 g vs 29 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 65% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 31% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has 15% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.1 g).
- Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Antica Ricetta 1936 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Antica Ricetta 1936
Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.
Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena
Patate, olio di semi di girasole, sale, Aceto Balsamico di Modena IGP, maltodestrina, zucchero, fecola di patate, acido citrico; aroma naturale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Antica Ricetta 1936 or Patatine al sale marino e aceto di vino balsamico di Modena?
Overall, Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Antica Ricetta 1936 has fewer calories: 484 kcal versus 494 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Antica Ricetta 1936 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.