Comparison

Süßkartoffel Pommes vs Antica Ricetta 1936

Overall, Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSüßkartoffel PommesAntica Ricetta 1936
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 154 kcal 484 kcal
Fat 7.6 g 24 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 2.1 g
Sugars 7.1 g 0.6 g
Salt 2.3 g 1.1 g
Fiber 2.6 g 5.5 g
Protein 2.3 g 7.2 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Süßkartoffel Pommes has 68% fewer calories (154 kcal vs 484 kcal).
  • Süßkartoffel Pommes has 68% less fat (7.6 g vs 24 g).
  • Süßkartoffel Pommes has 62% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 92% less sugar (0.6 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 52% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 54% more fiber (5.5 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has 68% more protein (7.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Antica Ricetta 1936 is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Süßkartoffel Pommes

Süßkartoffeln 89 %, Sonnenblumenöl, Würzung 4% (modifizierte Stärke, Reismehl, Dextrin, Speisesalz, Gewürze (Paprika, schwarzer Pfeffer), Knoblauchpulver, Zwiebelpulver, Backtriebmittel (Diphosphate, Natriumcarbonate), Verdickungsmittel (Xanthan), Paprikaextrakt).

Antica Ricetta 1936

Patate, olio di girasole alto oleico, sale marino.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Süßkartoffel Pommes or Antica Ricetta 1936?

Overall, Antica Ricetta 1936 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Süßkartoffel Pommes has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 484 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Antica Ricetta 1936 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons