Comparison
Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles cooked & pickled
Overall, Vongole sgusciate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vongole sgusciate | Cockles cooked & pickled |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 16.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cockles cooked & pickled has 39% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Cockles cooked & pickled has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Vongole sgusciate has 32% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Vongole sgusciate has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cockles cooked & pickled lists: Gluten, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Vongole sgusciate
Not available.
Cockles cooked & pickled
cockles (_mollusc_), water, salt, acetic acid, malt vinegar from _barley_(gluten)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vongole sgusciate or Cockles cooked & pickled?
Overall, Vongole sgusciate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cockles cooked & pickled has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vongole sgusciate has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pickled Cockles vs Vongole sgusciate
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Cockles in Brine vs Cockles cooked & pickled
Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles in Brine
Pickled Cockles vs Cockles cooked & pickled
Berberechos al natural vs Cockles cooked & pickled