Comparison

Cockles in Brine vs Cockles cooked & pickled

Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Cockles in Brine	Cockles cooked & pickled
Nutri-Score	a	d
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	91 kcal	82 kcal
Fat	1.8 g	1.1 g
Saturated fat	0 g	0.2 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	1.3 g	2.1 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	20 g	16.7 g
Additives	0	1
Allergens	Molluscs	Gluten, Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Cockles cooked & pickled has 40% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
Cockles in Brine has 38% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
Cockles in Brine has 17% more protein (20 g vs 16.7 g).
Cockles in Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
Only Cockles cooked & pickled lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Cockles in Brine

Not available.

Cockles cooked & pickled

cockles (_mollusc_), water, salt, acetic acid, malt vinegar from _barley_(gluten)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cockles in Brine or Cockles cooked & pickled?

Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cockles cooked & pickled has fewer calories: 82 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cockles in Brine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Pickled Cockles vs Cockles in Brine Berberechos al natural vs Cockles in Brine Berberechos al natural vs Cockles in Brine Berberechos al natural vs Cockles in Brine Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles cooked & pickled Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles in Brine Pickled Cockles vs Cockles cooked & pickled Berberechos al natural vs Cockles cooked & pickled