Berberechos al natural vs Cockles in Brine
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Berberechos al natural | Cockles in Brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 47 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Berberechos al natural has 48% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Berberechos al natural has 73% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Cockles in Brine has 47% more protein (20 g vs 10.7 g).
- Cockles in Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Berberechos al natural
_Berberechos_, agua, sal.
Cockles in Brine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Berberechos al natural or Cockles in Brine?
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Berberechos al natural has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Berberechos al natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.