Pickled Cockles vs Cockles in Brine
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pickled Cockles | Cockles in Brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pickled Cockles has 42% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Pickled Cockles has 40% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Cockles in Brine has 40% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Cockles in Brine has 17% more protein (20 g vs 16.7 g).
- Cockles in Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pickled Cockles lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pickled Cockles
COCKLES (_MOLLUSC_), WATER, SALT, ACETIC ACID, MALT VINEGAR FROM _BARLEY_ (_GLUTEN_). MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF _CRUSTACEANS_.
Cockles in Brine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pickled Cockles or Cockles in Brine?
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pickled Cockles has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pickled Cockles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.