Pickled Cockles vs Berberechos al natural
Overall, Berberechos al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pickled Cockles | Berberechos al natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 10.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Berberechos al natural has 11% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 53 kcal).
- Berberechos al natural has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Berberechos al natural has 29% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.1 g).
- Pickled Cockles has 36% more protein (16.7 g vs 10.7 g).
- Berberechos al natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pickled Cockles lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pickled Cockles
COCKLES (_MOLLUSC_), WATER, SALT, ACETIC ACID, MALT VINEGAR FROM _BARLEY_ (_GLUTEN_). MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF _CRUSTACEANS_.
Berberechos al natural
_Berberechos_ (_moluscos_), agua, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pickled Cockles or Berberechos al natural?
Overall, Berberechos al natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Berberechos al natural has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pickled Cockles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.