Comparison
Pickled Cockles vs Vongole sgusciate
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pickled Cockles | Vongole sgusciate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 53 kcal | 84 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pickled Cockles has 37% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 84 kcal).
- Pickled Cockles has 39% less fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pickled Cockles has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Vongole sgusciate has 33% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Vongole sgusciate has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pickled Cockles lists: Gluten, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Pickled Cockles
COCKLES (_MOLLUSC_), WATER, SALT, ACETIC ACID, MALT VINEGAR FROM _BARLEY_ (_GLUTEN_). MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF _CRUSTACEANS_.
Vongole sgusciate
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pickled Cockles or Vongole sgusciate?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pickled Cockles has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 84 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pickled Cockles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pickled Cockles vs Cockles in Brine
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Vongole sgusciate vs Berberechos al natural
Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles cooked & pickled
Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles in Brine
Pickled Cockles vs Berberechos al natural
Pickled Cockles vs Berberechos al natural