Vongole sgusciate vs Cockles in Brine
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vongole sgusciate | Cockles in Brine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 84 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cockles in Brine has no saturated fat, while Vongole sgusciate has 0.5 g.
- Cockles in Brine has 15% more protein (20 g vs 17 g).
- Cockles in Brine has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cockles in Brine lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Vongole sgusciate
Not available.
Cockles in Brine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vongole sgusciate or Cockles in Brine?
Overall, Cockles in Brine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vongole sgusciate has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vongole sgusciate has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.