Vielfrucht Riegel vs Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles
Overall, Vielfrucht Riegel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vielfrucht Riegel | Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 368 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 49 g | 49 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.9 g | 9.5 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vielfrucht Riegel has 16% less fat (9.2 g vs 11 g).
- Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles has 43% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles has 17% more fiber (9.5 g vs 7.9 g).
- Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles has 24% more protein (6.6 g vs 5 g).
- Vielfrucht Riegel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Vielfrucht Riegel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Vielfrucht Riegel lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Vielfrucht Riegel
Rosinen* 33%, CASHEWNÜSSE* 12%, Feigen* getrocknet 12%, Pflaumen* getrocknet 12%, Datteln* getrocknet, Aprikosen* getrocknet 12%, Palmöl*, Oblaten* (WEIZENMEHL*, Kartoffelstärke*) *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Mandel und Haselnuss enthalten.
Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles
Dates 59%, Raisins 15%, Cashews 14%, Almonds 10%, Freeze-dried blueberries 1%, Natural flavouring. May contain traces of peanuts, other nuts.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vielfrucht Riegel or Blueberry Muffin Myrtilles?
Overall, Vielfrucht Riegel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vielfrucht Riegel has fewer calories: 336 kcal versus 368 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vielfrucht Riegel has less sugar: 49 g versus 49 g per 100 g.