Comparison
Urid Dal Chilka vs Linzen
Overall, Urid Dal Chilka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Urid Dal Chilka | Linzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 16 g | 5.2 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 6.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Linzen has 75% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Linzen has 97% less sugar (0.2 g vs 7 g).
- Urid Dal Chilka has 68% more fiber (16 g vs 5.2 g).
- Urid Dal Chilka has 72% more protein (24 g vs 6.8 g).
- Urid Dal Chilka is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Urid Dal Chilka
Black Lentils
Linzen
Lentils, water, salt, antioxidant (ascorbic acid)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Urid Dal Chilka or Linzen?
Overall, Urid Dal Chilka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Linzen has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Linzen has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 7 g per 100 g.