Comparison

Unsmoked Rashers vs Unsmoked back bacon rashers

Overall, Unsmoked Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientUnsmoked RashersUnsmoked back bacon rashers
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 185 kcal 257 kcal
Fat 11 g 15.1 g
Saturated fat 4.4 g 5.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1 g
Salt 1.8 g 3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 21.5 g 29.4 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedPork

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Unsmoked Rashers has 28% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 257 kcal).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has 27% less fat (11 g vs 15.1 g).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has 20% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 5.5 g).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has 40% less salt (1.8 g vs 3 g).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 27% more protein (29.4 g vs 21.5 g).
  • Unsmoked Rashers has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Unsmoked Rashers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Unsmoked back bacon rashers lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Unsmoked Rashers

British Outdoor Bred RSPCA Assured Pork (96%), Sea Salt, Sugar, Preservatives: Potassium Nitrate, Sodium Nitrite. STORAGE INSTRUCTIONS: Keep refrigerated.

Unsmoked back bacon rashers

pork (87%), water, salt, natural flavoring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Unsmoked Rashers or Unsmoked back bacon rashers?

Overall, Unsmoked Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Unsmoked Rashers has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Unsmoked Rashers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons