Baconscheiben vs Unsmoked Rashers
Overall, Unsmoked Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Baconscheiben | Unsmoked Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 303 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 21.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked Rashers has 39% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 303 kcal).
- Unsmoked Rashers has 56% less fat (11 g vs 25 g).
- Unsmoked Rashers has 56% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 10 g).
- Baconscheiben has 69% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Unsmoked Rashers has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Unsmoked Rashers has 12% more protein (21.5 g vs 19 g).
- Unsmoked Rashers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Baconscheiben
Schweinefleisch*, Speisesalz, Glukosesirup, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Reifungskulturen, Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Unsmoked Rashers
British Outdoor Bred RSPCA Assured Pork (96%), Sea Salt, Sugar, Preservatives: Potassium Nitrate, Sodium Nitrite. STORAGE INSTRUCTIONS: Keep refrigerated.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Baconscheiben or Unsmoked Rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked Rashers has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 303 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsmoked Rashers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.