10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers vs Unsmoked back bacon rashers
Overall, 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers | Unsmoked back bacon rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 13.2 g | 15.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 7 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17.4 g | 29.4 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Pork | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 26% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 13% less fat (13.2 g vs 15.1 g).
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 16% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 5.5 g).
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 58% less salt (3 g vs 7 g).
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 41% more protein (29.4 g vs 17.4 g).
- 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
pork (87%), water, salt, preservatives (sodium nitrite, potassium nitrate), antioxidant (sodium ascorbate)
Unsmoked back bacon rashers
pork (87%), water, salt, natural flavoring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers or Unsmoked back bacon rashers?
Overall, 10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
10 Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.