Unsmoked bacon vs Unsmoked back bacon rashers
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsmoked bacon | Unsmoked back bacon rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 290 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 20.8 g | 15.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.7 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 25.2 g | 29.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 11% fewer calories (257 kcal vs 290 kcal).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 27% less fat (15.1 g vs 20.8 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 37% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 8.7 g).
- Unsmoked bacon has 80% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 17% less salt (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon rashers has 14% more protein (29.4 g vs 25.2 g).
- Only Unsmoked back bacon rashers lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Unsmoked bacon
Not available.
Unsmoked back bacon rashers
pork (87%), water, salt, natural flavoring, antioxidant: ascorbic acid,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsmoked bacon or Unsmoked back bacon rashers?
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked back bacon rashers has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 290 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsmoked bacon has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1 g per 100 g.