Unsmoked back bacon vs Bacon Grill Bacon Roll
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsmoked back bacon | Bacon Grill Bacon Roll |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 317 kcal |
| Fat | 12.6 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 10 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.9 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsmoked back bacon has 41% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 317 kcal).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 50% less fat (12.6 g vs 25 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 50% less saturated fat (5 g vs 10 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Unsmoked back bacon has 27% more protein (17.9 g vs 13 g).
- Only Bacon Grill Bacon Roll lists: Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Unsmoked back bacon
Not available.
Bacon Grill Bacon Roll
pork (43%), mechanically separated pork, water, pork fat, maize starch, pork rind, salt, milk protein, stabiliser (sodium triphosphate), smoke flavouring, sugar, preservative (sodium nitrite), spice extracts
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsmoked back bacon or Bacon Grill Bacon Roll?
Overall, Unsmoked back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsmoked back bacon has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsmoked back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.