Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking vs Suppengemüse
Overall, Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Unsalted Vegetable Stock for... | Suppengemüse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 8 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has 74% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 32 kcal).
- Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has 42% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Suppengemüse has 81% more protein (2.2 g vs 0.4 g).
- Only Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking
VEGETABLE STOCK (WATER, CARROT JUICE, CELERY JUICE, GARLIC JUICE, RED BELL PEPPER JUICE, ZUCCHINI JUICE, GREEN BELL PEPPER JUICE, ONION JUICE, LEEK JUICE, PARSLEY JUICE), YEAST EXTRACT, ONION POWDER, GARLIC POWDER, NATURAL FLAVOR, CARROT POWDER, SPICES (INCLUDING BLACK PEPPER, BAY LEAF, THYME)
Suppengemüse
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking or Suppengemüse?
Overall, Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Unsalted Vegetable Stock for Cooking has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.