Comparison
Suppengemüse vs Suppengemüse
Overall, Suppengemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Suppengemüse | Suppengemüse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 4.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Suppengemüse has 16% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Suppengemüse has 37% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Suppengemüse has 48% more protein (2.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Only Suppengemüse lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Suppengemüse
Karotten, Lauch, Sellerie, Petersilie
Suppengemüse
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suppengemüse or Suppengemüse?
Overall, Suppengemüse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Suppengemüse has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Suppengemüse has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.