Comparison

Torsades Pois Chiche vs Hummus nature

Overall, Torsades Pois Chiche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTorsades Pois ChicheHummus nature
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 359 kcal 245 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 19 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 2.4 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0.6 g
Salt 0 g 0.7 g
Fiber 16.7 g 4.8 g
Protein 20.4 g 6.2 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedSesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hummus nature has 32% fewer calories (245 kcal vs 359 kcal).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has 66% less fat (6.4 g vs 19 g).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has 63% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Hummus nature has 81% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has 71% more fiber (16.7 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has 70% more protein (20.4 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Torsades Pois Chiche has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Torsades Pois Chiche is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Hummus nature lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Torsades Pois Chiche

100% farine de pois chiches* (origine France),

Hummus nature

Préparation de pois chiches bio Ingrédients : pois chiches cuits* 53%, eau, huile de tournesol*, pâte de sésame* 8%, jus de citron*, ail*, sel de table, vinaigre d'alcool*, cumin moulu*, acidifiant : acide lactique, poudre de piment*. *De production biologique étrangère.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Torsades Pois Chiche or Hummus nature?

Overall, Torsades Pois Chiche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hummus nature has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hummus nature has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons