Tilapia Skinless Fillets vs Goldlocken
Overall, Tilapia Skinless Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilapia Skinless Fillets | Goldlocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 23.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 31% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 116 kcal).
- Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 45% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.4 g).
- Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 45% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Tilapia Skinless Fillets has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Goldlocken has 21% more protein (23.5 g vs 18.6 g).
- Tilapia Skinless Fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tilapia Skinless Fillets
Tilapia, carbon monoxide (treated to retain natural color).
Goldlocken
Tilapiafilet, Speisesalz, Buchenholzrauch, Schutzkultur
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilapia Skinless Fillets or Goldlocken?
Overall, Tilapia Skinless Fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilapia Skinless Fillets has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilapia Skinless Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.