Comparison
Thunfisch in Olivenöl vs Atun
Overall, Atun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thunfisch in Olivenöl | Atun |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 275 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atun has 28% fewer calories (198 kcal vs 275 kcal).
- Atun has 52% less fat (10 g vs 21 g).
- Atun has 75% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6 g).
- Thunfisch in Olivenöl has no salt, while Atun has 1.2 g.
- Atun has 37% more protein (27 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Thunfisch in Olivenöl
Thunfisch, Olivenöl, Salz
Atun
القيمة الغذائية المشار القيم(إليها في 0 10غ من المنتوج )المقطر
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thunfisch in Olivenöl or Atun?
Overall, Atun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atun has fewer calories: 198 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thunfisch in Olivenöl has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.