Comparison
Atun vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji
Overall, KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Atun | KAISER Tuniak v olivovom ole... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 198 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 27 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has 18% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has 41% less fat (5.9 g vs 10 g).
- KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has 27% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Atun
القيمة الغذائية المشار القيم(إليها في 0 10غ من المنتوج )المقطر
KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Atun or KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji?
Overall, KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
KAISER Tuniak v olivovom oleji has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atun has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Tuna Steak vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom...
Bonito del norte en acei... vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom...
Tuniak celé kusy v slneč... vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom...
Chilli tuna vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom...
Thunfisch in Olivenöl vs Atun
Atun vs Tuniak celé kusy v slneč...
Atun vs Chilli tuna
Atun vs Tuna Steak