Comparison
Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva vs Atun
Overall, Atun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonito del norte en aceite d... | Atun |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 198 kcal |
| Fat | 13.9 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 13.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 26.9 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 37% fewer calories (125 kcal vs 198 kcal).
- Atun has 28% less fat (10 g vs 13.9 g).
- Atun has 89% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 13.9 g).
- Atun has 96% less salt (1.2 g vs 26.9 g).
- Atun has 100% more protein (27 g vs 0 g).
- Atun has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva
Not available.
Atun
القيمة الغذائية المشار القيم(إليها في 0 10غ من المنتوج )المقطر
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva or Atun?
Overall, Atun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 125 kcal versus 198 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Bonito del norte en acei... vs KAISER Tuniak v olivovom...
Bonito del norte en acei... vs Chilli tuna
Bonito del norte en acei... vs Tuna Steak
Bonito del norte en acei... vs Bonito del Norte
Thunfisch in Olivenöl vs Bonito del norte en acei...
Bonito del norte en acei... vs Tuniak celé kusy v slneč...
Thunfisch in Olivenöl vs Atun
Atun vs Tuniak celé kusy v slneč...