Comparison

Thon au naturel vs Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel

Overall, Thon au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon au naturelThon Albacore au naturel à t...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 101 kcal 122 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 24 g 26 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Thon au naturel has 17% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 122 kcal).
  • Thon au naturel has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Thon au naturel has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Thon au naturel

Thon*, eau, sel.

Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel

Thon Albacore (Thunnus albacares).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon au naturel or Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel?

Overall, Thon au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Thon au naturel has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons