Thon au naturel vs Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel
Overall, Thon au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Thon au naturel
Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon au naturel | Thon Albacore au naturel à t... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thon au naturel has 17% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 122 kcal).
- Thon au naturel has 75% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- Thon au naturel has 71% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.3 g).
- Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Thon au naturel
Thon*, eau, sel.
Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel
Thon Albacore (Thunnus albacares).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon au naturel or Thon Albacore au naturel à teneur réduite en sel?
Overall, Thon au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon au naturel has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 122 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thon au naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.