Comparison

Thon albacore vs Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua

Overall, Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThon albacoreAtun aleta amarilla solido e...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — —
Calories 190 kcal 120 kcal
Fat 9.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 26 g 29 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has 37% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 190 kcal).
  • Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has 35% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has 10% more protein (29 g vs 26 g).
  • Only Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua lists: Fish, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Thon albacore

Not available.

Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua

ATÚN ALETA AMARILLA SÓLIDO, AGUAY SAL YODADA. CONTIENE: PESCADO. NO CONTIENE SOYA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thon albacore or Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua?

Overall, Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atun aleta amarilla solido en agua has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Thon albacore has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons