Comparison

Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak vs Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientThick Cut Pork Lion SteakFilet de porc mariné à l'and...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 172 kcal 99 kcal
Fat 9.9 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 3.7 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1 g 0.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 20.8 g 18.2 g
Additives03
AllergensPorkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 42% fewer calories (99 kcal vs 172 kcal).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 75% less fat (2.5 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 78% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has 13% more protein (20.8 g vs 18.2 g).
  • Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak lists: Pork.

Ingredients

Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak

Pork

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse

Filet de porc, eau, sel, épices (<0,6%), conservateur (nitrite de sodium), sucre, antioxydants (ascorbate de sodium, citrate de sodium) et arôme naturel. Sans gluten. Peut contenir des traces de SOJA.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak or Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has fewer calories: 99 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de porc mariné à l'andalouse has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons