Muschi file feliat vs Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak
Overall, Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muschi file feliat | Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 127 kcal | 172 kcal |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 9.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 20.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muschi file feliat has 26% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Muschi file feliat has 44% less fat (5.5 g vs 9.9 g).
- Muschi file feliat has 54% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.7 g).
- Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has 21% more protein (20.8 g vs 16.5 g).
- Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has the better Nutri-Score.
- Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Muschi file feliat
90% cotlet de porc fără os, apă, sare, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; zahăr, stabilizator: trifosfati; agent de îngroşare: algă marină Eucheuma prelucrată; antioxidant: eritorbat de sodiu; aromă.
Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak
Pork
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muschi file feliat or Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak?
Overall, Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muschi file feliat has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thick Cut Pork Lion Steak has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.