Comparison

Muschi file feliat vs Longe de porc

Overall, Muschi file feliat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuschi file feliatLonge de porc
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 127 kcal 187 kcal
Fat 5.5 g 5.7 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 2 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0 g
Salt 2.2 g 3.8 g
Protein 16.5 g 34 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Muschi file feliat has 32% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 187 kcal).
  • Muschi file feliat has 15% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Longe de porc has no sugar, while Muschi file feliat has 1.1 g.
  • Muschi file feliat has 42% less salt (2.2 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Longe de porc has 51% more protein (34 g vs 16.5 g).
  • Muschi file feliat has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Muschi file feliat

90% cotlet de porc fără os, apă, sare, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; zahăr, stabilizator: trifosfati; agent de îngroşare: algă marină Eucheuma prelucrată; antioxidant: eritorbat de sodiu; aromă.

Longe de porc

viande de porc, sel, dextrose, épices, arômes, conservateurs: nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muschi file feliat or Longe de porc?

Overall, Muschi file feliat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Muschi file feliat has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Longe de porc has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons