Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco vs Fasola czerwona konserwowa
Overall, Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco
Fasola czerwona konserwowa
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tartines bio craquante au no... | Fasola czerwona konserwowa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 397 kcal | 101 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 75% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 397 kcal).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 93% less fat (0.5 g vs 7 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 5.7 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 69% less sugar (2 g vs 6.5 g).
- Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has 14% more fiber (7 g vs 6 g).
- Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco has 13% more protein (8.4 g vs 7.3 g).
- Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco
Farine de riz, farine et poudre de noix de coco (15%), sucre de canne blond.
Fasola czerwona konserwowa
fasola czerwona, woda, sól
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tartines bio craquante au noix de Coco or Fasola czerwona konserwowa?
Overall, Fasola czerwona konserwowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fasola czerwona konserwowa has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fasola czerwona konserwowa has less sugar: 2 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.