Comparison

Tarte 3 fromages vs Tarte chèvre tomate

Overall, Tarte 3 fromages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTarte 3 fromagesTarte chèvre tomate
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 172 kcal 207 kcal
Fat 10 g 9.7 g
Saturated fat 6 g 3.4 g
Sugars 2.3 g 4.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 2.1 g
Protein 12 g 4.8 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tarte 3 fromages has 17% fewer calories (172 kcal vs 207 kcal).
  • Tarte chèvre tomate has 43% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 6 g).
  • Tarte 3 fromages has 49% less sugar (2.3 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Tarte 3 fromages has 27% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tarte chèvre tomate has 100% more fiber (2.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Tarte 3 fromages has 60% more protein (12 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Only Tarte 3 fromages lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Tarte 3 fromages

Eau, œufs 13,8%, emmental 12,9%, Bleu d'Auvergne AOP 8,6%, pommes de terre, blanc d'œuf de poules élevées en plein air 5,1%, fromage blanc, mozzarella 3,3%, lait écrémé en poudre, amidon de maïs, farine de blé, ciboulette, sel, poivre noir, muscade.

Tarte chèvre tomate

Oignons 36,7% (oignons, huile d'olive, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique), farine de blé, tomates 14%, eau, huile d'olive, fromage de chèvre 7%, courgettes 3,4%, levure, sel, pulpe d'ail (ail, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique), herbes de Provence, épices.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tarte 3 fromages or Tarte chèvre tomate?

Overall, Tarte 3 fromages has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tarte 3 fromages has fewer calories: 172 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tarte 3 fromages has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons