Comparison

Tarama vs Tarama degustation

Overall, Tarama degustation has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaramaTarama degustation
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 563 kcal 504 kcal
Fat 58 g 51 g
Saturated fat 4.1 g 3.8 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 5.6 g 9 g
Additives64
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish, Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tarama degustation has 10% fewer calories (504 kcal vs 563 kcal).
  • Tarama degustation has 12% less fat (51 g vs 58 g).
  • Tarama has 39% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Tarama degustation has 92% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Tarama degustation has 38% more protein (9 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Only Tarama lists: Milk.
  • Only Tarama degustation lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Tarama

Huile de colza, ,œufs de cabillaud 30%, sel, conservateur : E211, eau, semoule de _blé_ dur, chapelure (farine de _blé_, eau, sel, levure), _crème_ (_crème_, gélifiant : E407), colorant E120, acidifiant : E270, conservateurs : E262 et E202, sel, sirop de glucose déshydraté, extraits d'épices

Tarama degustation

Huile de colza ; œufs de cabillaud fumés et salés 40% (œufs de cabillaud 38%, sel) ; eau ; jus de citron concentré 1,1 % (dont sulfites) ; chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel) ; sucre ; conservateurs : E262, E202, E211 ; colorant : E120.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tarama or Tarama degustation?

Overall, Tarama degustation has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tarama degustation has fewer calories: 504 kcal versus 563 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tarama has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons