Tapioca vs Pisto Ratatouille
Overall, Tapioca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tapioca | Pisto Ratatouille |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 354 kcal | 97 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pisto Ratatouille has 73% fewer calories (97 kcal vs 354 kcal).
- Tapioca has no fat, while Pisto Ratatouille has 5.2 g.
- Tapioca has no saturated fat, while Pisto Ratatouille has 0.9 g.
- Tapioca has 50% less sugar (3.4 g vs 6.8 g).
- Tapioca has no salt, while Pisto Ratatouille has 0.6 g.
- Pisto Ratatouille has 50% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pisto Ratatouille has 80% more protein (1 g vs 0.2 g).
Ingredients
Tapioca
Fécule de manioc*
Pisto Ratatouille
Pisto con 5% de aceite de oliva virgen extra. Producto pasteurizado. Categoría comercial: primera Ingredientes: tomate (95 g para elaborar 100g de producto), 39% hortalizas en proporción variable (calabacín, pimiento y cebolla 5% aceite de oliva virgen extra, azúcar, sal y acidulante: ácido citrico.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tapioca or Pisto Ratatouille?
Overall, Tapioca has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pisto Ratatouille has fewer calories: 97 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tapioca has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.