Comparison
La croquante vs Tapioca
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | La croquante | Tapioca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- La croquante has 89% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 354 kcal).
- Tapioca has no fat, while La croquante has 0.6 g.
- La croquante has 67% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0.9 g).
- La croquante has 82% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.2 g).
- La croquante has the better Nutri-Score.
- La croquante is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
La croquante
Chou blanc, carotte, frisée, poivrons rouges
Tapioca
Fécule de manioc*
FAQ
Which is healthier: La croquante or Tapioca?
Overall, La croquante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
La croquante has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tapioca has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.