Comparison

Tapena' Olives et Tomates vs Spread

Overall, Tapena' Olives et Tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTapena' Olives et TomatesSpread
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 260 kcal 581 kcal
Fat 25 g 65.5 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 12.5 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0 g
Salt 2.6 g 0.8 g
Fiber 3.5 g 0 g
Protein 1.8 g 0 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 55% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 581 kcal).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 62% less fat (25 g vs 65.5 g).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 78% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 12.5 g).
  • Spread has no sugar, while Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 3.2 g.
  • Spread has 68% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 100% more fiber (3.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has 100% more protein (1.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Tapena' Olives et Tomates is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Spread lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Tapena' Olives et Tomates

Olives noires 28 %, olives vertes 28 %, tomates 25 % (tomates mi-séchées concentré de tomates), huile de colza, ail, sel, sucre, persil, origan.

Spread

Vegetable oils (olive oil 21%), water, salt, emulsifiers (soy lecithin, 471), preservative (202), acidity regulator (270), flavour, colour (160a). Contains soy.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tapena' Olives et Tomates or Spread?

Overall, Tapena' Olives et Tomates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tapena' Olives et Tomates has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 581 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Spread has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons