Taboulé au petit épeautre vs Taboulé aux 5 légumes
Overall, Taboulé aux 5 légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Taboulé au petit épeautre | Taboulé aux 5 légumes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 157 kcal | 151 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Taboulé aux 5 légumes has 23% less fat (5.6 g vs 7.3 g).
- Taboulé aux 5 légumes has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Taboulé au petit épeautre has 31% less sugar (2 g vs 2.9 g).
Ingredients
Taboulé au petit épeautre
Petit épeautre cuit 17,2% [petit épeautre, eau], concombre 16,4%, semoule de BLÉ dur 16%, tomate 13,2%, eau, jus de citron 4,2%, huile d'olive vierge extra, oignon 3,7%, huile de colza, ciboule, persil, menthe 1,5%, jus d'orange concentré 1,4%, jus de citron vert 0,8%, sel, ail en purée, coriandre, oignon en poudre 0,02%, cardamome, curcuma.
Taboulé aux 5 légumes
Légumes 53% (carottes cuites, tomates, maïs, concombres, échalotes), semoule de blé dur réhydratée 33% (semoule de _blé_ dur, eau), jus de citron à base de concentré 6,5%, huile de colza, épices, sel, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Taboulé au petit épeautre or Taboulé aux 5 légumes?
Overall, Taboulé aux 5 légumes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Taboulé aux 5 légumes has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Taboulé au petit épeautre has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.