Comparison

Taboulé à la menthe vs Mon taboulé méditerranéen

Overall, Taboulé à la menthe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTaboulé à la mentheMon taboulé méditerranéen
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 128 kcal 178 kcal
Fat 2.6 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1 g
Sugars 2.3 g 6.3 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.4 g
Fiber 2.3 g —
Protein 3.9 g 3.9 g
Additives01
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Taboulé à la menthe has 28% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 178 kcal).
  • Taboulé à la menthe has 68% less fat (2.6 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Taboulé à la menthe has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Taboulé à la menthe has 63% less sugar (2.3 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Mon taboulé méditerranéen is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Taboulé à la menthe

Boîte de garniture (550 g) : Tomates fraîches 54% - eau - oignons frais 8% - poivrons rouges 2,7% - menthe 2,2% - huile d'olive vierge extra 2,2% - concentré de tomates - sel - persil 0,7% - arôme - jus concentré de citron 0,5% - poivre. Sachet de semoule de _blé_ dur précuite (180 g).

Mon taboulé méditerranéen

semoule de blé dur réhydratée 53% (eau, semoule de blé dur), légumes (poivrons, tomates, oignons), huile d'olive vierge extra, huile de colza, raisins secs, olives noires 2,9%, épices, jus de citron à base de concentré, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, sucre, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Taboulé à la menthe or Mon taboulé méditerranéen?

Overall, Taboulé à la menthe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Taboulé à la menthe has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Taboulé à la menthe has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons