Surkål vs Col troceada
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Surkål | Col troceada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 16 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Col troceada has 64% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Col troceada has no fat, while Surkål has 0.5 g.
- Col troceada has 87% less sugar (1.2 g vs 9.3 g).
- Col troceada has no salt, while Surkål has 1.1 g.
- Col troceada has the better Nutri-Score.
- Col troceada is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Surkål lists: Fish.
- Only Col troceada lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Surkål
strimlet hodekål 72 %, lake (vann, sukker, eddik, salt, konserveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat), fortykningsmiddel (guarkjernemel), krydder), karve.
Col troceada
col (repollo), agua, sal y antioxidante: E-223. Contiene sulfitos.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Surkål or Col troceada?
Overall, Col troceada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Col troceada has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Col troceada has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 9.3 g per 100 g.