Sultana scones vs Potato scones
Overall, Potato scones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sultana scones | Potato scones |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 205 kcal |
| Fat | 12.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 19.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Potato scones has 42% fewer calories (205 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Potato scones has 93% less fat (0.9 g vs 12.9 g).
- Potato scones has 97% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 7.7 g).
- Potato scones has 91% less sugar (1.8 g vs 19.1 g).
- Sultana scones has 51% less salt (1.1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Sultana scones has 54% more protein (8.3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Potato scones has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sultana scones lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Sultana scones
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), SULTANAS (21%), BUTTERMILK (15%), BUTTER (MILK) (12%), Sugar, Pasteurised Free Range Whole Egg, CLOTTED CREAM (MILK) (3%), Raising Agents: Diphosphates, Sodium Carbonates
Potato scones
Re-hydrated Potato Flake (78%), WHEAT Flour (Gluten) (with added calcium carbonate, iron, niacin (B3) and thiamine (BI)),Vegetable Oil (Rapeseed), Salt, Raising Agent (E450i, E500ii), Preservative (E202).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sultana scones or Potato scones?
Overall, Potato scones has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Potato scones has fewer calories: 205 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Potato scones has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 19.1 g per 100 g.