Sticks de la mer vs Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking
Overall, Sticks de la mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Sticks de la mer
Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sticks de la mer | Plan-Based Egg Substitute fo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 202 kcal | 307 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.4 g | 22 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sticks de la mer has 34% fewer calories (202 kcal vs 307 kcal).
- Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking has no fat, while Sticks de la mer has 12 g.
- Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking has no saturated fat, while Sticks de la mer has 1.6 g.
- Sticks de la mer has 62% less sugar (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Sticks de la mer has 53% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking has 66% more fiber (22 g vs 7.4 g).
- Sticks de la mer has 61% more protein (7.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Sticks de la mer has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sticks de la mer lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Sticks de la mer
Eau, chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel, poudre de paprika), graines de soja, pâte (eau, farine de blé, sel), huile de tournesol non hydrogénée, amidon de pomme de terre, fibre de blé, affermissant (chlorur de calcium), épaississants (alginate de sodium, méthylcellulose), farine de soja, extrait de levure, vinaigre, arôme naturel, sel de mer,
Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking
Mąka z tapioki, skrobia ziemniaczana, łuska babki jajowatej, substancja zagęszczająca: guma guar, inulina (cykoria), barwnik: beta-karoten, sól himalajska.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sticks de la mer or Plan-Based Egg Substitute for baking and cooking?
Overall, Sticks de la mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sticks de la mer has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 307 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sticks de la mer has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.