Comparison

Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac vs Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara

Overall, Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSpicy Smoky Dreamy MacKnorr pasta snack pot carbon...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 101 kcal 98 kcal
Fat 1 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 1 g
Sugars 1.6 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.9 g 0.5 g
Protein 3.7 g 3.3 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has 67% less fat (1 g vs 3 g).
  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has 27% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has 42% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has 11% more protein (3.7 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac

Dried Pasta 50% (Durum _Wheat_ Semolina), Potato Starch, Maltodextrin, Flavourings, _Soya_ Protein, Coconut Extract 3%, Dried Red Pepper, Sugar, Dried Spring Onion, Onion Powder, Garlic Powder, Spices, Jalapeño Chilli, Chives, Salt, Colours (Curcumin, Paprika Extract), Black Pepper.

Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac or Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara?

Overall, Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Knorr pasta snack pot carbonara has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Spicy Smoky Dreamy Mac has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons